🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include events where African descendants are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.